联系我们 | 国际 | 加入收藏

Self as enterprise: digital disability practices of entrepreneurship and employment in the wave of ‘Internet + disability’ in China

2018-11-08 10:42:37     作者:Zhongxuan Lin, Zhi’an Zhang and Liu Yang     

Zhongxuan Lina, Zhian Zhanga and Liu Yangb*

aSchool of Communication and Design, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Peoples Republic of China; bSchool of Journalism and Communication, Chongqing University, Chongqing, Peoples Republic of China

ABSTRACT

Situated in Chinas neoliberal context and its rapid development of information communication technologies (ICTs), this study aimed to examine how disabled people in China transformed themselves into new self-enterprising subjects in the wave of Internet + Disability.In order to answer this question, this study tried to develop an analytical framework to illustrate the disability practices that situated in the ICTs and neoliberal context, underpinned by the discourse of self as enterprise,and demonstrated by the practices of entrepreneurship and employment. Based on the research design of case studies and methods that included ethnographic participant observation and in-depth interviews, this study explained how a disabled entrepreneur, Mr. Yuan, took advantage of the wave of Internet+Disabilityto realize his dream of entrepreneurship and face the uncertainties of a precarious entrepreneurship. It also explained how Mr. Yuans employees achieved their dreams of employment but suffered the precariousness of enterprising subjects.

KEYWORDS:  China; disability; ICTs; neoliberalism; self as enterprise

Introduction

According to the China Disabled PersonsFederation (CDPF, 2012), approximately 85,000,000 people in China were estimated to have disabilities in 2010. With such a large population of disabled people equivalent to the population of Germany it is of vital importance to promote disabled peoples development, equality, and participation in society. The rapid development of ICTs in China has demonstrated its potential to be used by disabled people to improve quality of life and social inclusion in China.

However, previous studies have generally been too optimistic to overestimate the importance of ICTs, and to simplify the dynamic relationship between ICTs and disability (Adkins, Summerville, Knox, Brown, & Dillon, 2013; Easton, 2013). They also have the problem of failing to situate themselves within the dynamic contextual entanglement of political, economic, cultural, and social factors (Adam & Kreps, 2009; Ellcessor, 2016; Goggin & Newell, 2003; Moser, 2006). This study, therefore, situated itself in Chinas neoliberal context and its rapid development of ICTs to investigate both macro-level power structures and micro-level individual struggles to explain how ICTs are appro- priated to govern the disabled population in a Foucauldian concept of self as enterprise.In particular, this article focused on one specific website, hubangwang(literarily helping each other), which is the biggest platform of online jobs for disabled people in China(Liu & Zhou, 2016), as a case study to examine the following research question: How do dis- abled people in China transform themselves into new self-enterprising subjects in the wave of Internet + Disability?

Literature discussion

ICTs and the promise of technology for disability

Since the disability politics and advocacy movement in the 1960s and 1970s, critical dis- ability studies, mainly based on the social model, have gained wide currency among dis- ability researchers and disability community. However, this new dominant model has increasingly faced criticism since its development, especially in the new and changing social context of the digital age (Feely, 2016; Flynn, 2017; Goggin & Newell, 2003; Levitt, 2017a, 2017b; Oliver, 2013).

One of the key problems of critical disability studies is that they focus primarily on the discourse concerning disability but overlook the material world, especially the new digital world, that disabled people inhabit (Feely, 2016; Flynn, 2017). However, the development of ICTs has become increasingly influential for disabled people to achieve disability equal- ity by themselves in society (Easton, 2013). Therefore, some scholars have begun to explore the impact of ICTs on disabled people, defined as the promise of technology(Adkins et al., 2013, p. 503).

From this optimistic perspective, scholars argue that ICTs have become an essential aspect of most peoples lives and should thus be regarded as basic human rights for dis- abled people (Borg, Larsson, & Östergren, 2011). Against this background, optimistic scholars seek to understand the relationship between ICTs and disability and to explore how the digital inclusion of disability may hold great promise for disabled people in their struggle against social exclusion (Goggin & Newell, 2003; Vicente & Lopez, 2010). Such scholars suggest that disabled people can take advantage of ICTs to overcome hurdles to participate more in society, with benefits in a range of ways, including information accessibility (Dobransky & Hargittai, 2006), online anonymity (Thoreau, 2006), and relationship development (Chadwick, Wesson, & Fullwood, 2013).

This optimistic approach is criticized, however, for romanticizing the development of ICTs and its potential promise of digital inclusion while ignoring the digital exclusion of disabled people (Adam & Kreps, 2009; Easton, 2013; Vicente & Lopez, 2010). Referencing primarily the digital dividetheory, critical scholars argue that disabled people are placed in a more severely unequal position during the digital wave, thereby falling into the most disadvantageous status of the information have-notsand becoming one of the most extreme but traditionally ignored populations of the digital divide(Chadwick & Wesson, 2016; Dobransky & Hargittai, 2006; Scholz, Yalcin, & Priestley, 2017).

Together, the optimistic and pessimistic approaches investigate the relationship between ICTs and disability, but previous studies from both approaches seem to focus too much on the micro-level relationship between ICTs and disability, especially ICTs as a game-changer for disability, ignoring the macro level, which involves the broader structure of ICTs and disability. In other words, most previous studies, as de-contextualized studies, failed to examine the power structure that ICTs and disability both created and were situ- ated in (Ellcessor, 2016). Without such a contextualized perspective, most previous studies have been argued to be business as usualthat reproduces and replicates the oppressive discourse of disability (Goggin & Newell, 2006, p. 310). Therefore, the following literature discussion attempts to situate ICTs and disability in Chinas specific neoliberal context to explore the more complicated relationship between ICTs and disability in China.

Discourse of self as enterprisein Chinas neoliberal context

The element and the context of neoliberalism have been somewhat lost in traditional criti- cal disability studies (Flynn, 2017; Goodley, 2011). Therefore, many scholars have argued that we should not ignore the neoliberal doctrine that exerts great impact on disabled people (Harris, Owen, & Gould, 2011; Mladenov, 2015). In this sense, China in the post-Mao era, as one of the most representative neoliberal countries (Harvey, 2007; Rofel, 2007), can serve as a unique setting for studying ICTs and disability in the neoliberal context in the Internet age.

Since the Reform and Opening in 1978, China has employed the Foucauldian discourse of self as enterpriseas a developmental strategy in its new neoliberal context (Hansen & Svarverud, 2010; Yan, 2009). The distinctive feature of the Foucauldian concept of self as enterpriseis that the self is to be remade into a sort of permanent and multiple enterprise(Foucault, 2008, p. 241). It is based on a principle of active self-regulation that construes the individual as an entrepreneur of his own life, who relates to others as competitors and his own being as a form of human capital(McNay, 2009, p. 63). Through the active self- regulation of self as enterprise, the self is co-opted into normalizing social dynamics, and the regulation of conduct becomes a matter of each individuals desire to govern their own conduct freely in the service of the maximization of a version of their happiness and fulfil- ment that they take to be their own(Miller & Rose, 2008, p. 215).

The Chinese Party-state employs this neoliberal technology to encourage individualized citizens to be self-responsible, self-enterprising, and self-governing subjects(Zhang & Ong, 2008, p. 3). In this sense, self as enterprisehas become a new governing apparatus for the Party-state to create a kind of socialism at a distance, in which privatizing norms and practices proliferate in symbiosis with the maintenance of authoritarian rule(Zhang & Ong, 2008, p. 4). Therefore, Hoffman (2006) argues that this sort of discourse has been promoted to achieve a new self-enterprising subject, which has an affinity with the Party- state and relies on and contributes to the overall strength of the nation(p. 566).

This neoliberal context is also argued to make self-enterprising subjects in the field of disability in China (Dauncey, 2012), encouraging disabled people to be sort of self as enterpriseas well. As Dauncey (2012) argues, the Chinese government has developed a heroic narrative structure of triumph over tragedyto encourage disabled people to rely mainly on themselves to triumph over their individual tragedy, using the discourse of self-strengthening(ziqiang) and self-supporting(zizu) (p. 312). In this sense, the disabil- ity discourse concerning kao ziji(literally, relying on oneself in Chinese) is related to the Foucauldian neoliberal governmentality that reorganizes social relations and behaviors around the grain of enterprises(Foucault, 2008, p. 149). It has been argued that this sort of discourse of kao zijihas close relations to governmentality (Yapp, 2017, p. 634). There- fore, Yapp (2017) develops the idea of disability as exception and exceptions to disability,which was designed to track how this identity category becomes a key neoliberal technol- ogy that produces populations and modes of subjectivation(pp. 634635). This neoliberal discourse concerning the privileges of self-responsibilization(Makhulu, 2016, p. 5) has become the representative of a logic of independence from state-sponsored welfare(Yapp, 2017, p. 638) across divergent fields related to disability. According to Yapp (2017), the neoliberal discourse of disability as exception has been deployed to support the growing logic around neoliberalism in China.

Entrepreneurship and employment of disability in the neoliberal context

We would therefore like to situate this study in Chinas neoliberal context, to explore the complicated relationship between ICTs and disability, especially the exercise of the dis- course of the self as enterprisethat transforms disabled people as self-enterprising sub- jects in the Internet age. In particular, this study would like to focus on two crucial issues, namely, entrepreneurship and employment, of disability in the neoliberal context.

To some extent, neoliberalism has become an intertwined entrepreneurial project that creates forms of entrepreneurial living, or makes a living appear as entrepreneurship (Stensrud, 2017). Accordingly, the figure of the entrepreneur has become sort of bench- mark of success in the neoliberal culture (Duffy, 2017), inspiring entrepreneurial subjec- tivities that desire for wealth (Bröckling, 2016; Marwick, 2017; Weeks, 2011). These entrepreneurial subjects increasingly define themselves as self-branding entrepreneurs rather than employees(Robinson, 2017, p. 2018) on the one hand, and suffer risks, uncer- tainty, and precariousness on the other hand (Dewhurst, 2017; Stensrud, 2017).

Especially, disabled people have long been assumed to lack the necessary capacities to establish or run their own business (Renko, Harris, & Caldwell, 2015). They face various challenges, including economic challenges resulting from a lack of financial support and capital, socio-cultural challenges rooted in norms and views that underestimate and dis- criminate against disabled capabilities, and personal and attitudinal challenges stemming from a lack of business training (Barnes & Sheldon, 2010; Hwang & Brandon, 2015). These challenges are more prominent in China due to the discourse of kao ziji,such as self- strengtheningand self-supporting,and the individual-oriented model whereby disabled people must rely primarily on themselves (Dauncey, 2012).

Similarly, employment is critically important for disabled people since it has the poten- tial to deconstruct disability, labouring shows that you are doing something: you are able. Work is enabling(Bates, Goodley, & Runswick-Cole, 2017, p. 172). Therefore, access to an employment-based income is a marker of disabled peoplesocial inclusion and partici- pation (Barnes, 1999; Oliver & Barnes, 2010). Especially in a neoliberal society, disabled people are being produced as idealized workers with disabilitiesand included in neolib- eral workplaces(Friedner, 2015, p. 121). Therefore, employment has become a powerful image that symbolizes effective self-governanceas part of the neoliberal policy of shift- ing social risks from the state onto the individual(Darcy, Taylor, & Green, 2016, p. 1246). This employment doctrine has been extended to govern disability in the neoliberal era and has become a key determinant of disabled peopleability to access opportunity, choice and development (Mladenov, 2015; Wilton & Schuer, 2006). Especially in Chinas neoliberal context, the employment indicates a persons contribution to the socialist construction on the one hand, and responsibility to the family on the other hand (Lin, Yang, & Zhang, 2018).

Research question, framework, aims and methods

Based on the literature discussion, this study attempts to employ the theoretical frame- work of self as enterpriseto research the question of how disabled people in China have transformed themselves into new self-enterprising subjects in the wave of the Inter- net + Disability.In order to answer this question, this study tries to develop an analytical framework to illustrate the disability practices that situated in the ICTs and neoliberal con- text, underpinned by the discourse of self as enterprise,and demonstrated by the prac- tices of entrepreneurship and employment. The analytical framework is illustrated in Figure 1.

By answering this research question, this study aims to propose a contextualized under- standing of ICTs and disability which may have broader recognition in other and even a global context. The study also seeks to contribute to the ICTs studies, digital economy studies, neoliberalism studies and other relevant research field.

In order to achieve these research aims, this study used research methods that included ethnographic participant observations and in-depth interviews, with a purposive sampling strategy. Virtual participant observation is suitable for understanding vivid activities and personal experiences through firsthand online involvement (Julian, 2010), and in-depth interviews are argued to be central to virtual ethnography (Miller & Sinanan, 2014). Pur- posive sampling refers to strategies in which the researcher exercises his or her judgment about who will provide the best perspective on the phenomenon of interest, and then intentionally invites those specific perspectives into the study(Abrams, 2010, p. 538).

Initially, we purposively identified hubangwang as the targeted field for ethnographic participant observation, and Mr. Yuan, the founder of hubangwang, as the key informant for our further in-depth interviews. From 1 October 2016 to 1 December 2017, we con- ducted 14 months of fieldwork on hubangwang for participant observation, with more

  page6image19744

Figure 1. Digital disability practices of entrepreneurship and employment in China.

than 100,000 words of fieldnotes. Then, we conducted an in-depth interview with Mr. Yuan for 100 min, and another 60 in-depth interviews, each lasting an average of 60 min, with disabled job seekers and workers from hubangwang. All interviewees had been kept anonymous.

The limitation of the research design lies in the single case study design. But we believe that we can strategically choose a meaningful case as a unit of analysis from which to elu- cidate a singular practice or phenomenon, since qualitative researches aim at the in-depth understanding rather than the generalization of social issues and practices (Abrams, 2010; Merriam, 1998).

Disability-related service structure in China

Before investigating the micro-level individual practices of disabled people, this section will first examine the macro-level disability-related service structure in China, which underpins our further studies on the individual entrepreneurship and employment later.

First, Chinas law on disability could not fully achieved its goals to ensure disabled peopleequal and full participation in society. Until 1990, China promulgated its first basic law, Law of the Peoples Republic of China on the Protection of Disabled Peopleto protect disabled peoples rights. However, there are no sanction mechanisms that can be used to ensure the enforcement of the law, even the government has conceded that it has proven more difficult to put the law into operation than other laws because deep-rooted prejudice against the disabled still exists(Pearson, Wong, & Pierini, 2002, p. 367).

Second, the Chinese government does not take its responsibility to guarantee disabled peoples rights and welfare as something actively protected by the law; rather, it leaves such responsibilities solely to disabled people themselves within a family support system (Pier- ini, Pearson, & Wong, 2001). The disability-related issues usually do not become a policy priority for the government (Fisher & Jing, 2008; Huang, Guo, & Bricout, 2009). In this sense, Chinese governments policies are not made based on a social model but rather on an individual-oriented model, whereby disabled people must rely primarily on them- selves rather than the government (Yang, 2015).

Third, China used to rely mainly on the quasi-official organization, the CDPF, to pro- vide disability-related service and philanthropy for disabled people. However, this state- controlled and government-sponsored system of official philanthropycould not meet disabled peopleneeds. It mainly requires disabled people to be independent, to rely on themselves, and to live with their families, and only in the absence of family support is the government expected to provide social services(Fisher & Jing, 2008, p. 172). There- fore, there was a gap between what the CDPF promised and what disabled people actually received.

Fourth, it is very difficult to register Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), including disability-related NGOs, to provide social philanthropy and service beyond the official structure in China. It is argued that Chinese government remains deeply dis- trustful of foreign influence and organizations outside its control due to its unique political system; therefore, there are very few social organizations focused on disability-related ser- vice in China (Zhang, 2017), with the first such organization established in 2006, almost 20 years after the establishment of the CDPF (Luo & Zhang, 2015; Zhang, 2017).

Against this backdrop, many scholars have argued that Chinas special disability-related service structure could not fully guarantee or promote the social inclusion of disability in China; rather, it may lead to a more severe social exclusion of Chinese disabled people than reported for their counterparts in the West (Kohrman, 2005; Miles, 2000; Stone, 1996; Vaughn, 1993; Xun, 2002). The development of ICTs in China has become a new and increasingly important variable with this disability-related service structure. Especially since 2014, China has proposed the programs of mass entrepreneurship and innovationthat encourage entrepreneurship and innovation via the Internet. In particular, Premier Li Keqiang issued a directive to encourage disabled people to take advantage of the programs to realize the dreams of employment and entrepreneurship and create a happier and bet- ter life through labor(Zhang, 2015). Since then, the wave of Internet + Disabilityspread across China, with hundreds of thousands of people realizing their dreams of entrepre- neurship and employment via Internet (Ali Public Welfare, 2017).

Mr. Yuan stood out from the crowd during this wave. As Mr. Yuan explained,

thanks to the development of ICTs, now I can rely on myself to achieve my entrepreneurship. Through the Internet platform of hubangwang, we can provide service and create value for other companies at a relatively low cost. I call this new mode of philanthropy entrepreneurial philanthropy,the philanthropy in the new age.

In this sense, hubangwang and other ICTs-based platforms such as this, as a sort of entre- preneurial philanthropy,have become a new organic and complementary part of the dis- ability-related service structure in China. Furthermore, Mr. Yuan has taken advantage to this wave to achieve his dream of entrepreneurship, and hundreds of thousands of disabled people has achieved their dreams of employment, proposing a typical case for studies on the digital disability practices of entrepreneurship and employment in China.

Precarious entrepreneurship

Born in and growing up in a poor family in an underdeveloped area, Mr. Yuan said his life was even more difficult than his peers because he was also a disabled person in such situ- ation. Due to a bout of childhood polio, one of Yuans legs is 4 cm shorter than the other, which influenced his entire life, especially his education, employment, and entrepreneur- ship. He did not have the opportunity to attend college after his graduation from the high school. Due to his disability, he could not find suitable long-term employment after leav- ing the high school; he thus spent much time hopping from one job to another and strug- gling for a job that provided a livable wage. Before founding hubangwang, Yuan had tried various types of temporary jobs, such as working as a real estate agent, a hair dresser, and an auto supplies salesman. Yuan said he had long lived at the bottom of society, had directly and deeply experienced the difficulties, hardships, sorrows and bitterness of life as a disabled person.

Yet, despite the adverse condition, Yuan always had a dream of entrepreneurship, situ- ated in Chinas broader neoliberal context. Since the Reform and Opening, popular slo- gans, such as to get rich is glorious(zhifu guangrong), that encourage personal success and achievement have sprung up in China (Bao & Haas, 2009). The neoliberal context led to a transformation of the social discourse toward desire’ – longings, needs, aspirations and dreams in a post-socialist desiring China (Rofel, 2007). Yuan stated that he intensely

desired success in becoming gloriously rich, just like most other Chinese people. However, he also hoped that realizing his personal dream of entrepreneurship would help other dis- abled people. Therefore, Yuan started the website of hubangwang in 2011 to achieve his dream of entrepreneurship on the one hand, and to assist other disabled people by offering jobs online to achieve their dreams of employment on the other hand. As Yuan stated, I am a self-made person, but I hope my entrepreneurial dream can help as many disabled persons as possible, so that we can together highly contribute to our family, society and country.In this sense, this self-made dream of entrepreneurship resonated with the dis- course of self as enterprise, on the one hand, and the notion of the overall strength of the nation,on the other hand (Hoffman, 2006, p. 566).

However, there is much hardship in entrepreneurship due to his disability and especially the neoliberal discourse of self as enterpriseor kao zijiin China. Yuan had to face all the challenges and uncertainties on his own, in a new flexible mode of self-realiz- ation and a paradoxical compulsion to responsibility (McNay, 2009). It took almost two years from 2011 to 2013 for Yuan and hubangwang to attract 14,915 registered members and offer 4216 online jobs. But Yuan had not found the revenue modelof hubangwang yet, rather, he used to self-position hubangwang as sort of Disabled Peoples Organization (DPOs), pinning his hope on government welfare and social philanthropy. As Mr. Yuan explained,

I optimistically thought that I may get adequate resources and government support. But, the reality is very cruel. The government may support you on paper, and many people may sup- port in spirit, but they could not really support you substantially. Notwithstanding the fact that the government and society helped me once or twice, they could not always help me. I have to rely on myself to find my own way out of the dilemma.

Mr. Yuan used to be one of the advocates who practiced this kind of DPO as a sort of social philanthropy,but he ultimately failed. His enterprise had dramatic ups and downs so that when there was government funding and philanthropic donations the enterprise flourished taking on dozens of employees, while on the brink of bankruptcy without those supports. During the difficult time, Yuan and his enterprise struggled on the edge of survival, and once, he even had to sell his own house to pay off bank loans. His house was also his workplace, and he was the entrepreneur and the only employee at the same time, becoming a sort of entreployee(Hartmann & Honneth, 2006). Yuan said he had been used to enduring heartbreak, sleepless nights and disturbing nightmares. However, the difficulties did not defeat him; rather, they helped him to strengthen his entrepreneurship resolve, which had become Yuans attitudinal and entrepreneurial com- mitment, and to increase his social competencies, which are of critical importance for dis- abled entrepreneurs (Bagheri & Abbariki, 2017). Yuan even believed that the disability featured in his path toward success. In Yuans own words, for disabled persons like me, hardship is the normalcy of daily life. Especially in the way of start-up, hardship is the other side of entrepreneurship.

Yuans persistence finally paid off in 2014, and all his efforts were rewarded in the wave of Internet + Disability.Yuan seized this opportunity to find an alternative model of dis- ability-related philanthropy in China, a business-likephilanthropy of sorts (Dart, 2004, p. 290), with new marketizedideologies, doctrines and practices underlying entrepre- neurial philanthropy (Bajde, 2013, p. 3). We no longer seek the philanthropy of the government or society; rather, we seek to exchangein the market, a new mode of mar- ket-oriented philanthropy ... I call this new mode of philanthropy entrepreneurial phi- lanthropy<